With vesting, a beneficiary does not get the share immediately but rather holds the right to the share after a specified period or the achievement of a specific milestone. The simplest way to describe it is like IOU (I Owe You) with a set of conditions that have to be met.
Equity compensation is becoming increasingly more popular regardless of company size and geography. Especially now at the apogee of the Hustle Economy. When you offer shares to employees as part of their compensation package, you naturally want the offer to be attractive to them as a recruitment and retention mechanism while at the same time driving a long term value for your company. The best way to motivate employees drive long-term success is to incentivize employees by creating an alignment of personal and corporate interests.
Therefore, share vesting is an important component to evaluate when planning equity compensation to motivate employees, drive employee retention, engagement encourage loyalty and alignment.
Vesting is the process of obtaining full ownership of an asset. When an employees earn or are assigned an asset, they do not have full control of it until either the specified period has elapsed, a specified milestone based vesting has been achieved, or a hybrid, which is a combination of both period-based and milestone-based vesting.
Once the vesting condition or conditions for fully and vesting meaning it have been achieved, the option beneficiary owns the entire asset and can exercise rights over it (e.g. buy and/or sell it).
Vesting works by setting criteria to become the owner of an asset. If the criteria are not met, the shares have not yet been fully vested and consequently are not owned. There are three main types of stock vesting here: milestone based stock vesting amount-based (aka as target-based), time-based, stock vesting amount-based (the most common) and a combination of both. Let us take a look at the following examples:
The recipient can obtain equity ownership in their asset when the company or start up has completed a specific milestone of a project (e.g. IPO), or when performance targets are reached.
Stock options are generally time-based. If an option has a time-based vesting schedule of 3 years, the recipient will have to wait that period to receive his options under the relevant time-based vesting schedule, which could be cliff vesting or a graded vesting schedule. We will dive into the differences between cliff vesting and graded time based vesting schedule later in the article.
Vesting for Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) or Performance Stock Units (PSUs) is usually hybrid in private companies or small businesses as is based on a combination of time milestones, internal to the company conditions and some external conditions, typically tied to the relative performance of the company vis-à-vis its peer group of companies.
Vesting schedules the acquisition of a right. It applies in various situations. In Italy, e.g., vesting is a mode of v. concerning the acquisition of a right in rem after a congruous period of maturation (➔ period) in which one has exercised it as if, although not being the owner, one were the owner of the right itself and in the absence of opposition to such conduct on the part of the legitimate owner.
The type of vesting is highly dependent upon the outcome that the enterprise is seeking. For example, with a a one year vesting cliff, two-year vesting cliff and a four-year vesting schedule, employees must spend a certain amount of time in the organization before they are entitled to receive the asset.
When the employee completes the types of vesting schedules, they are gradually allowed a higher percentage. This incentivizes employees and encourages loyalty. Immediate four year vesting schedule is not as common as the other two as it does not require the employer or the recipient to wait a certain period of time to obtain ownership of the shares vested.
There are three types of vesting: time-based, target-based and milestone-based, time based vesting and finally hybrid vesting, time-based and target-based.
This is a process by which you enable employees to earn or receive full or partial ownership of in shares. Suppose you offer your employee stock options with a cliff vesting of 3 years. This means that they will only be able to exercise their rights to the shares (e.g. buy them, sell them) once 3 years have elapsed. After 3 years, they will be able to exercise at the initially agreed price (e.g. exercise price) and sell the allocated shares.
In the economic-financial sector, the definitive accrual of the right to a pension (➔ compulsory pension), both old age and seniority, is relevant and is regulated in detail by the legal term of the states. The retirement plans have different modalities regarding the necessary requirements and, in particular, the length of the accrual period.
Another important area in finance concerns the full vesting schedule of rights to the exercise of stock options (to subscribe to shares of the enterprise at a favourable price; stock options or company stock) by members of the Board of Directors, Consultants, or Third Parties as an extension of the enterprise itself. This is fairly common when seeking to onboard strategic partners or any other party that can drive top-line growth or provide strategic competitive positioning.
Typically, the full vesting schedule of this right is either gradual (progressive) over a certain period of time (i.e., so many stock options are fully vested per year for each year in which one has operated) or hybrid, inclusive of both time and milestone metrics.
Alternative forms are those that provide for a latency period, at the end of which all rights accrued during that period accrue at the same time (cliff vs. graded). Cliff may be followed by a period of progressive accumulation. While definitively acquired pension rights may not be forfeited or revoked (except, of course, by operation of law), rights concerning stock options must be exercised under penalty of forfeiture within a certain period after the termination of the employment or collaboration relationship or, in any case, within a certain time after their definitive consolidation.
In determining the criteria for linking the fringe benefit of an employee who receives stock options in the international context, the amount unlike stock options' vesting schedule is of particular importance. This is also in connection with the conventional rules on the subject, which are based on Article 15 - Income from Employment of the OECD Articles of the Model Convention with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital.
Stock options are a form of incentive for strategic corporate resources, usually top management. Companies offer stock incentives to senior employees as a special form of incentive and a compensation package to create an alignment on the achievement of long-term results.
Through the adoption of stock options, an employee or collaborator is given the right to purchase, at the end of a given period, shares of the same company stock or another company in the group at a fixed price, usually represented by the value the securities had on the date the options were granted.
In a vesting schedule plan, we can distinguish some fundamental moments:
As mentioned above, in a stock option plan, we can identify three main phases:
Thus, the vesting period is the period of time before the shares of an employee's stock option plan are unconditionally owned by an employee. Vesting is a legal term meaning to give or earn a right to a present or future payment, asset or benefit. As a reminder, through common stock, the employee has to earn the right to buy a certain number of shares at a fixed price. This happens monthly or quarterly basis at the end of a set period of time commonly referred to as 'vesting'.
Vesting is, therefore, the process by which an employee with shares fully vested in a stock option plan is entitled to benefit from their equity ownership. The employee stock and vesting period is only for employees who have the opportunity to purchase employer-provided shares. In the employee stock option plan, the shares vest and options granted under the plan confer a right but not an obligation on the employee.
For taxation purposes, where the options right is not already transferable to a third party, the relevant moment for taxation purposes in the hands of the employee is the same example as the moment the option right is exercised (i.e. the 'exercising'). Until the employee leaves that moment, there is no taxable moment for direct tax purposes.
The rule only governs the case where the employee retains the option right until the date of its exercise. The assignment of a transferable option right must be taxed as employment income from the time of the assignment.
If a non-transferable right subsequently loses this requirement, its value must be taxed only in the tax period in which it became transferable.
It is further held that the limit of EUR 2,065.83 of non-taxability refers exclusively to the tax year in which the assignment of the shares takes place. This is the case regardless of whether such exercise is conveyed by different options granted at different times.
However, Article 51(2) of the TUIR provides for the exclusion from employment income of shares allocated to the employer contributions of each employee. A value limit is provided for, i.e. not exceeding €2,065.83 for each tax period.
The value of the shares allocated, net of the amount paid by the employee, is subject to taxation as employment income for the part exceeding the limit. This limit is to be referred to the entire tax period and not to individual allocations.
The general provisions indicated so far are complicated when we are faced with cases of international mobility of the employee who is benefiting from stock option plans.
Let us take, for example, the case cited by Circular No. 17/E/2017 of the Agenzia delle Entrate in Italy. The case in point is that of a manager employed by a foreign company or a multinational group of private companies. This employee was then hired by the Italian subsidiary of the same employer or group.
The employee was assigned Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) during his relationship with the foreign company. RSUs entitle the holder to receive, at the end of a fixed period, a number of shares, without payment of any consideration.
In this context, the manager wonders about the tax treatment to which the RSUs should be subject at the end of their common vesting schedule, meaning at a one-year milestone based cliff their monthly or quarterly basis and their common vesting schedule. The Agenzia Delle Entrate in the practice document under comment states that the principle to be referred to is that of the vesting period.
Being, in fact, fringe benefits linked to the manager's employment contract, it is necessary to divide the vesting period between the period spent abroad and the period, instead, spent in Italy. Only the latter vesting period must be taxed in Italy.
Returning to our case, the manager has become a resident in Italy and, therefore, the employer is required to declare in Italy the fringe benefits related to the employee leaving the employer contributions the RSUs accrued since one year cliff his return to Italy. In this case, it must also be reported that the worker, at the time of one year cliff his return to Italy, opted for the Forfeiture Regime, in the year in which he transferred his tax residence to Italy.
In conclusion, share-based compensation and the associated vesting criteria are important elements of equity compensation plans that can drive employee retention, engagement, and alignment with company goals. Due consideration should be given to how to design these plans to create as close to perfect alignment between individual employee and company interests. Each type of vesting has its advantages or disadvantages and year-cliff, and the choice of vesting schedule depends on the company's goals and objectives.
Companies and start ups need to carefully consider factors such as the duration of the vesting period, the percentage of ownership granted enables employees at each interval, and the impact of forfeiture provisions unlike stock options when evaluating vesting schedules. By designing effective vesting schedules, companies can create an alignment of personal and corporate interests, incentivize employees, and promote long-term success.